Skip to main content


The bible book of Ruth has been portrayed for centuries as a wonderful story of the love and loyalty that Ruth had for her mother-in-law, Naomi. But, what they don't tell you is that it is also a story of what is commonly known as "sugaring". Sugaring is a practice wherein a "sugar baby" receives financial support and material benefits from a "sugar daddy" in exchange for companionship and, oftentimes, sex. The sugar baby is usually a young woman, and the sugar daddy a well-off older man. 

I would like to rename the bible book of Ruth to "Boaz: The Sugar Daddy". Why? Because that is essentially what this section of the bible really is about- a young woman in need receives financial assistance from a rich, older man. In exchange, the wealthy older man gets companionship and sex. 

On the surface, the bible book of Ruth tells the story of the unbreakable friendship between Ruth and Naomi. Naomi is a Jewish woman who, because of a famine, leaves her home country and settles in Moab with her husband and two sons. Eventually, both her sons marry Moabite women, one of them named Ruth. During the course of ten years, the story goes, Naomi's husband and two sons die, leaving her and her daughters-in-law widowed. Naomi hears that the famine in Israel is over, so she decides to go back. After insisting to her daughters-in-law that they stay in Moab and find husbands, Ruth makes the decision to leave her country and go live in Israel with Naomi. 

In those times, women were not allowed to hold property or get jobs, leaving Naomi and Ruth poor and destitute. Boaz, an elderly rich man, capitalizes on their desperate situation and offers the much younger Ruth financial security...with the condition that she be his wife. Boaz marries Ruth, becomes her provider and benefactor, enjoys her youth and vitality, and Ruth receives financial security. Essentially, turning this relationship into the sugar baby/sugar daddy arrangement. God, according to the story, looks favorably upon this arrangement and "blesses" them.

Why God, who supposedly is fair and just, would bless an arrangement that wholly disempowers a woman and makes her completely dependent on a man, is baffling. Of course, it is not baffling at all if we consider that there is a simple explanation- the bible was written in a sexist and male dominated time where women were second-class citizens unworthy of even holding a job or property. No wonder the story says that God blesses this arrangement, because, in reality, God didn't bless this arrangement at all. It was the author of the book of Ruth who blesses this arrangement. Why? Because obviously the writer of the book of Ruth is a sexist misogynist man who believes that women are second-class citizens unworthy of holding a job or property.

The bible book of Ruth is a male egotistical story that only serves to denigrate women and glorify an era where women had no rights. The only thing the book of Ruth is good for is to rip out its pages and use them as fodder for a bonfire on a cold night. In fact, I think I might do that.

-Miguel Gonzalez

For similar articles:


Popular posts from this blog


  ABORTION. Few words evoke more intense feelings and colliding viewpoints than this word. A presidential candidate's stance on that single matter is enough to sway voters one way or another in an election year and decide the next administration...that is how deep-seated people's views on abortion are. The line in the sand has been drawn and the trenches have been dug, a civil war of ideological views is being fought at this very moment and on many different fronts. This topic is relevant now more than ever. Seems like our courts are always one step closer to being pro-choice or one judge closer to banning abortion clinics. Many women just stand back and hold their breath...wondering when the chips will fall and a new law or a removal of an existing one will hijack their reproductive systems and strip them of control over their own bodies.  Others, filled with "holy" zeal for "God's word", become giddy with anticipation at any glimmer of hope that a cons


Over the past few years, concern and awareness regarding animal cruelty has been increasing. We now, more than ever, understand that animals are intelligent and emotional beings, with rich social lives. They are capable of feeling love, care, empathy, joy, pain, fear, distress, and terror, similar to you and me. That is why there has been a growing movement to end animal cruelty.  Animal cruelty has taken on many forms. Whether it be for sport, consumption, or religious ritualistic ceremonies, the theme is the same: complete disregard for the pain and suffering these innocent creatures endure. Any book that purports itself to be a moral guide for humanity should, by all means, condemn the practice of animal cruelty. Instead, in the bible, we find that animal cruelty is glorified. The first instance of animal cruelty that we see in the bible is found in Genesis chapter 4, verse 4. The New International Version reads: "And Abel also brought an offering, fat portions from some of the


Throughout the bible one can find many passages that are immoral, some more than others. But one of them really takes the cake. And if there was one bible story that could single-handedly dismantle the notion that the bible is a holy book, it would be this one. Even though some Christian apologists have tried to rationalize it, it really is just a desperate attempt to hide what truly is a despicable bible passage.  Before I reveal to you what the worst verse in the bible is, I'm going to give you a little bit of background information on it. Genesis chapter 19 describes how a man named Lot saw two men in the city square. Assuming they were travelers, he told the men to stay at his house, since nightfall was approaching. After some hesitation and a little back and forth, they agreed. Some time later, after the men had dinner and were preparing to go to bed, a mob shows up at Lot's doorstop. They called out to Lot, demanding him to bring out the two men so that they could rape th